Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Royal International Venture RIL.V (was Labrador Int'l LAB) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Abner Hosmer who wrote (1718)	11/21/1998 1:39:00 AM
From: Ed Pakstas	Respond to of 3380

Not gonna touch that one...<ggg>...G'night...ed

To: Abner Hosmer who wrote (1718)	11/21/1998 8:33:00 AM
From: Buckey	Respond to of 3380

TOM - Well, I am one of the dumb-sh#ts that just bought into NAI at .26, LOL - that is my last entry TOO on NAI Fortunately my last entry on da LAB is .21 so all is not lost

To: Abner Hosmer who wrote (1718)	11/21/1998 10:31:00 AM
From: 1king	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3380

Tom, That is very interesting. You are absolutely correct about the obscurity of the data. I was trying earlier this year to find out exactly what had been done and it was impossible. I talked to LAB people several times and they told me there was NEVER any TEM done on the property, before this latest round. The EM survey was an HLEM (Maxmin) survey to follow-up airborne conductors. It was part of the original program....they went around checking airborne conductors and establishing mini-grids over them. HLEM was completed and drill farts were then completed. Drill farts are holes so short they are not worth a fart of BIG PICTURE technical info. If you look at the total meterage divided by 11 you will see we are talking 50 something metre average. Sparkes told me what happened there is what went on all over the SVB program. They drilled so many of these anomalies with very short holes and encountered graphite in most (usually indicated on surface). This is the reason Teck gave up using EM for the 1997 season until Keats came in and made them do it. Teck figured all EM shows is graphite and could not readily distinguish signals so they ran gravity over everything in Gods creation. It was easier to understand...they thought. They were since proven wrong there! The data was never released because the work/drilling was considered a huge flop. I am going over the stuff you posted and I will get back to you. L8R 1King