To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (15497 ) 11/21/1998 6:06:00 PM From: jbe Read Replies (1) | Respond to
Re: Clinton & Sexual Harassment (Again)Would the judge have ruled differently, had Clinton told the whole truth and nothing but the truth? What do you think? Would the judge have changed her mind about the materiality of Clinton's testimony -- about Lewinsky -- if he had told the whole truth? Would the judge have dismissed the case, if he had told the whole truth? pattern of harassment. On that point, Judge Wright specifically said, in her decision, that Jones had to prove her own case: Whether other women may have been subjected to workplaceshe has a case worthy of submitting to a jury. washingtonpost.com The Scaife business, Paula Jones political leanings, the "evil" Linda Tripp are completely irrelevant to the core issue of whether of not Bill Clinton sexually harassed one Paula Corbin Jones in that Little Rock hotel. even if the President had behaved himself in that Little Rock hotel room exactly as Jones said he had. That alone was not sufficient, under the requirements of Title VII and Arkansas law, to prove a charge of sexual harassment. Eventually, the Judge complied with the President's request for a summary judgment, on the following grounds: (1) plaintiff cannot show either quid pro quo or hostile work environmenteven resolving all do not constitute severe lying under oath the President is charged with allegedly occurred in his testimony about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky , not Paula Jones.
