SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dialogic ready to soar, funds buying -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: cecil who wrote (601)11/23/1998 8:11:00 AM
From: Roy F  Respond to of 674
 
I really don't have too much to offer in the way of an explanation... but, when options expire, all logic goes out the window. Be patient and see what happens now.



To: cecil who wrote (601)11/23/1998 9:43:00 AM
From: jas cooper  Respond to of 674
 
Here's a thought...

Don't wait for it to hit the big guys radar screens. I've been buying at 19-21 (one buy too soon at 26).

Growth has been inconsistant, and Wall Street doesn't like that. I think they are a market leader in an important tech field. A couple of good quarters, and you'll see that $60-80.

A little patience, and a strong stomach may be the ownership requirements on DLGC.

Hoping for the best...

jas.



To: cecil who wrote (601)11/23/1998 3:03:00 PM
From: Roy F  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 674
 
cecil,

The following in an excerpt from an article by Eric Dubin, the Techstalker of MSN Strategy Lab that offers a possible explanation:


Group think: Musing on Dialogic 'investors'

If you think the so-called experts on Wall Street always understand what is going on with technology stocks, you may be pleasantly surprised to learn that the fast-moving tech world regularly humbles portfolio managers and analysts alike. These hard-working and well-meaning ladies and gentlemen often succumb to what social scientists call "group think."

"Group think" is much like the herd instinct. When times are good, the bulls rampage and the herd drives stocks higher. When fear strikes, the herd very easily can stampede for the exits. After a stampede for the exits, small-cap stocks are usually the last the herd is willing to buy. This is where our Dialogic (DLGC) story gets interesting, and where "group think" has quite a bit to do with the present valuation of the stock.

Group think extends a level deeper than generic herd instinct; it develops when the very institutions within a system create a culture that rewards conformity. For the moment, consider the fact that many money managers find their pay indirectly linked to how well they perform on a quarterly basis. Given this, it's not likely they will go against the grain -- to wear the hat of a contrarian. In our historic bull market, the far "safer" strategy has been to buy positions with favorable price momentum.

To some extent, the same pressures manifest for "sell-side" analysts. How would you feel if you had to listen to your firm's clients pepper you with questions (at best) after a stock you identified as a "buy" at $25 fell under $20? Even if you knew fundamentals would eventually improve and there was a solid and conservative case that the stock would move to $35 in less than 12 months, you might be hesitant to continue to call the stock a "buy" when the short-term floor collapsed. It's not an accident that analysts often rush to downgrade stocks after a catalyst has struck and a stock has already crashed!

In Dialogic's case, I believe group think is operating. It's very clear that voice and fax transmissions over packet-based networks like the Internet will rise in importance. Next year, this market will begin to build momentum. This will greatly benefit Dialogic, but Wall Street is under the mistaken impression that, given recent acquisitions, Cisco Systems (CSCO) is going to eat Dialogic's lunch.

Although Cisco's presence in this market is new, it's important to realize that in many cases, the hardware Dialogic sells may, in fact, benefit from the standardization process Cisco's presence will further. Take, for example, the recent announcement that Cisco and VocalTech Communications (VOCLF) will work together on standardizing gateways for Internet telephony. Since the Nov. 11 announcement, VocalTech has rocketed more than 50% higher while Dialogic has fallen.

Who do you think makes the boards that go into VocalTech's systems? Dialogic! The information is in plain view on VocalTech's Web page, but "group think" has portfolio managers continuing to fear Dialogic's total lack of momentum and the "C" word -- Cisco.

Although it is not certain how VocalTech will work with Cisco over time, Dialogic likely will not be pushed totally out of the VocalTech/Cisco relationship because Cisco still has a use for the type of uplink boards Dialogic can provide. It's not an absolute positive for Dialogic, to be sure. Cisco has little incentive to push Dialogic's hardware. But standardization efforts almost always are good for technology industries and VocalTech's independent sales efforts will increase, benefiting Dialogic.

Dialogic's high-end hardware likely will see an acceleration of sales in the second half of 1999, as companies like Nortel (NT) and Alcatel (ALA) integrate Dialogic's DM3 platform. Money managers are most concerned about Dialogic's high-end sales. But when revenue momentum returns -- and it will -- investors will return, sending the stock much higher.

I expect Dialogic shares to sell at $35 or higher at some point in 1999. I think the odds of this happening are better than 85%. In my book, a $15 profit on a $20 stock is a "buy," even if it proves to be dead money for six months.

Ultimately, Dialogic may be bought out. Its assets (technology, loyal engineers, market leading customer relationships, etc.) are undervalued at the current quote and numerous telecommunications equipment companies are seeking to beef up their packet-network based telephony product portfolios. I would not be surprised if Dialogic is bought by Alcatel, Nortel or Lucent in 1999.



To: cecil who wrote (601)11/23/1998 3:58:00 PM
From: JEM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 674
 
Cecil,

At one time a few short months ago, most people thought that the board makers (Dialogic and Natural Micro) were going to have a field day in the VoIP space. Slap some boards into an NT server, buy an H.323 stack and you were in the VoIP gateway business.

Problem is that the NT server architecture might be okay for the enterprise, but just is not enough of a real time operating system to do voice properly.

If you look at the second generation VoIP cards from these guys, they have external ethernet interfaces on their PCI cards. This means the only thing the PCI cards were using NT server for is power (and sometimes a call control API).

But even for the people that need call control applications, the industry is starting to move to MGCP so that applications are deployed in the network and not on the gateways. There are many reasons for this, but that is another subject.

So, for what once looked like a very bright future in the VoIP space has dimmed considerably. If you look at most of the large VoIP networks being deployed, most do not use these guys' boards, most are using embedded technology, leveraging architectures that look like Remote Access Servers. The larger VoIP networks that come to mind are ICG/Netcom, VIP Calling, USA Global Link, net2phone using these style gateways.

Dialogic's talent in life is building high density DSP based boards. You might think that this gives them an advantage in the VoIP space, but it doesn't. To understand why, ask yourself the question "Why aren't dial(modem) platforms built out of Dialogic cards?" Instead, people like Ascend used proprietary architectures (not Dialogic cards) to do very competitively.

And VoIP is far tougher than dial. Much more signaling and real time constraints.

And the final question to ask, will all of those DSPs out there in the VoIP gateways be used for CTI, Dialogic's core business. Sure, but not to the extent that is required by speech recognition. Cisco's latest VoIP gateway on the 5300 has IVR built right into the gateway.

Just the way I see it, but hope it helps.

JEMstar