Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (12894)	11/22/1998 2:20:00 PM
From: Spider Valdez	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26163

janice i did not say andy mann must explain dtc policy or responsible for it. but he must show cause to why stock should not be returned. there are 2 things happen now janice dear. first is to extend injunction & restraining order to include dtc. this will lift freeze. second thing is andy mann must show cause why the stock should not be returned. i ask you how he can do this. federal court case show us that not only did he not return stock he stamped "paid" on promissory note. after court reject that andy mann claim he paid for stock with other stock. this is not possible since you can not purchase reg s stock with other stock. also andy mann claim 'back & neck' stock he use to pay for reg s was $6 share. you claim it was $6 a share also but to date you can not document this. i say, as court shows, it was high of $.25. it is public co. so you can dis prove this if you wish. after this fail in court andy mann claim stock was compensation for time he got for aznt on home shopping network. problem is, as court case shows, aznt never on home shopping network. andy mann lose in federal court. he try filing case again & again in state court but always thrown out because federal court takes precedence. so you see you wild claims about gary sylver are just that. pure crazy stuff. you make big fool of yourself when truth can be easily found. spider

To: Janice Shell who wrote (12894)	11/23/1998 6:35:00 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Janice, Spugsie is just replaying his old role with RMIL. If one has time to spend, they can review his daily analysis of the Mork court case, how Mork was going to lose everything, blah, blah, blah, and actual questions about RMIL went unanswered. Everything RMIL said, was true! So what they did not own 3 plants they said they did, it was just part of Mork's conspiracy! (That line of reasoning still makes absolutely no sense) Or one on my favorites, RMIL is waiting to start trading again, but is waiting to do so because of their plan! Everyone who questioned his reasoning was desperate. A term that does not go unnoticed on here. <s> On this thread, Mork is played by Andy Mann, otherwise, any questions about the actual company are not important. Whether releases are false or not are unimportant. Whether or not the website has FDA violations is irrelevant to discuss. What is important to discuss as we post on the AZNT thread is Andy Mann...business fundamentals once again are not discussed, and for a reason... Violations doomed RMIL, should shareholders not be concerned about questions regarding violations here?