SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JBL who wrote (27733)11/22/1998 8:47:00 PM
From: llamaphlegm  Respond to of 164684
 
it's actually quite good -- just made some purchases -- good selection, cheap prices ... has anyone else used them? thoughts on your experiences.



To: JBL who wrote (27733)11/22/1998 9:43:00 PM
From: wildbill  Respond to of 164684
 
JBL

re your post 27735; all excellent points, especially with regard to the issue of countless other AMZN competitors now coming to the marketplace.

As investors realize that the internet trend includes bringing competitors to the marketplace at lightening speed, and success ALWAYS breeds new competition (see CPQ, now selling PC's via the internet in competition w/DELL... it was just a matter of time!), AMZN's stock price will fall back to earth.

The market is not known for being slow to respond to trends, just for excessively responding.



To: JBL who wrote (27733)11/22/1998 10:45:00 PM
From: Rob S.  Respond to of 164684
 
I won't say that Bezos' strategy is a failure - that is yet to be proven. He has been highly successful building early sales momentum and promoting the stock to Investors. But it is also yet to be proven that his model for success will pan out. His model requires buying market share and then, hopefully, reaping rewards through lower costs of spreading overheads out on more business. But Barnes & Noble, WallMart and others expect to lose money on their Internet operations for 5 or more years and stand to benefit their walk-in sales through the advertising and promotion they get on the Internet. This "cross-polination" of advertising and tie-ins with the Internet are not posible with Amazon. So what? Because the competitors will have a lower overall cost of business - being able to spread their advetising expense over a broader base of business. There are many creative new "Internet tie-in" strategies that are just starting to emerge that will make plain Internet merchants seem sterile in comparison. The Internet is powerful, but combine the power of the Internet with the "touchy-feelies" of walk-in and immediate pick-up that stores deliver and the combination becomes a knock-out.

Several months ago, I advocated on this thread that Barnes could build multi-media kiosks in their stores in which people could come by and see live presentations and inter-active Q&A and discussions by authors and musicians. Guess what, that's part of Barnes~.com's new Internet strategy. They now have 4.6 million titles available on-line in 350 of their stores and are building tie-ins from the Internet. Many people like myself would prefer to find some things on the Internet but then go out and see them and buy them at the local store. Finding the right thing can take time and going somewhere only to find that it is not in inventory is a hassle. But if you can look on the web, narrow a selection down to a few thing, check to see which store(s) in your area has them and then go to visit - that's the way I would prefer to do business most of the time. Make it convenient, make it easy, and make it quick. Then if you shop for some things and decide to return some, you don't have to go out to a postal service to have it shipped UPS. Amazon can't duplicate that.



To: JBL who wrote (27733)11/22/1998 11:38:00 PM
From: David Lee  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 164684
 
I would completely disagree with your statement that Amazon's internet business model is a failure. On the contrary it is the model to which many companies are trying to emulate for electronic commerce. Much like all computer companies are trying to emulate the DELL (virtually zero-inventory) model...Who wouldn't love to establish the amount of revenue that AMZN has without a single dime spent on brick-and-morter? AMZN is the zero-marginal-cost dream that internet commerce promises.

As far as the lawsuit goes, I don't believe it's a technology issue at hand, but more of a marketing/forecasting issue. Once again I tip my hat to Mr Bezos for taking a page from Mr Gate's playbook -- STEAL THE TALENT.

In any case -- Though I'm am weary of this hyper-run up of AMZN of late, I have faith that AMZN is very much going to be the DELL of the next 5 years.

Best of luck,

David Lee