Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (42073)	11/23/1998 1:15:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575422

-4% I think the "sudden" discovery of the Win95 timing bug might have had something to do with it (but not all as double witching was on Friday). Wall street didn't seem to react to it when it was first "discovered". Might well present another buying opportunity. Jim

To: Paul Engel who wrote (42073)	11/23/1998 1:17:00 AM
From: Petz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575422

ut-oh, Intel, recent online AMD chat session says, "there is no 500 MHz K7" In other words, the first K7 will be faster than 500 MHz. This is what AMD has been saying all along, the journalists just don't like to believe it. From some other quotes from the chat session, I think its a fair assumption that the K7 will debut at 600 MHz with 200 MHz independent busses to the L2 cache and main memory. chiptech.com Read especially the 4 last 11/21/98 posts. Petz