SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (22418)11/23/1998 12:01:00 PM
From: mark silvers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39621
 
Emile,

Nice try my friend.

As to your article, saying that someone is jewish is a long way from proving that they control, manipulate, or even care enough to promote jewish viewpoints. It is a weak argument. I know many jews who are critical of Isreal, just as I know many christians who are critical of the church. Most people in big business have one relgiion, Power. they dont care enough to use their power to promote anything but their own continued designs on power. If they cared more about spirituality, the world would be a different place.

Now for my views....

Yes I am for abortion in many cases. In many cases it is the humane option, IMO. I am not asking you to agree with me on this, but suffice it to say that many intelligent andsympathetic people fall into BOTH camps on this issue. does this make some sort of evil talmudic heathen? if it does, then half of the world falls into this category with me, (including some christians)

Pre-marital sex- I am all for it. Especially when I was single. It is just like you to make it seem like I advocate small children having sex. I am an advocate for responsible sexuality amongst those that are mature enough to handle it.

As for the not believeing that anyone died for my sins, and not believeing in original sin, If that makes me a talmudic jew, or whatever, then that is your problem. Once again it does put me in the majority of the world, but that in and of itself proves nothing(much like your argument as a whole)

Mark