SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenya AA who wrote (37208)11/23/1998 2:04:00 PM
From: csm  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
How much longer till we eat up that supply at $35?

Stuart.



To: Kenya AA who wrote (37208)11/23/1998 2:52:00 PM
From: John Koligman  Respond to of 97611
 
As for you question on why Microsoft is up, it's probably due to some thinking the AOL deal is a positive for Microsoft in regard to the current legal action...

November 23, 1998

Microsoft Says Talk of a Merger
Shows Flaws in Government Case

An INTERACTIVE JOURNAL News Roundup

Microsoft Corp. wasted little time in portraying merger talks
between America Online Inc. and Netscape Communications
Corp. as evidence that the federal government's antitrust case
against it is fundamentally flawed.

William Neukom, Microsoft's general
counsel, took to the steps of the federal
district courthouse in Washington, D.C.,
Monday morning to lay out Microsoft's
case.

"From a legal standpoint, this proposed deal pulls the rug out
from under the government," Mr. Neukom said. "In fact, the mere
possibility of this kind of a combination completely undermines
the government's case from start to finish."

All three companies involved in the proposed deal -- marketing
support from Sun Microsystems Inc. is expected to be a key
piece of the merger -- compete ferociously against Microsoft in
the software and Internet markets.

Mr. Neukom said the combination would
bring a dramatic change in the
competitive landscape of the industries,
adding that the proposed deal shows
that there is "vigorous competition" in
the marketplace and that Microsoft
faces "resourceful and creative competitors."

"The government should not be taking sides in such a dynamic
and competitive industry," said Mr. Neukom. "As this deal shows,
the marketplace is always five steps ahead of government
intervention."

A Justice Department official said an AOL-Netscape deal would
have no impact on the antitrust case against Microsoft.

It would do "nothing to remove the obstacles Microsoft has
placed in the way" of competitors "seeking to challenge its
desktop operating-system monopoly," he said.

As outlined by the parties involved, what the deal would do is give
both AOL and Sun additional resources for the pitched battles
with Microsoft the two firms think are in their future.

AOL already dominates consumer access to the Internet, and is
girding itself for a duel with Microsoft over consumer Internet
access via TV set-top boxes.

By purchasing Netscape, AOL would be able to reach many
more Internet users who go online at work, and extend AOL's
Internet reach.

These moves would therefore put AOL in even more direct
competition with Web navigation companies like Yahoo! Inc.,
Excite Inc., Lycos Inc. and Infoseek Corp. -- which have all
become major hubs, or portals, for Internet traffic. Netscape has
been building up its portal site, called Netcenter, over the past
year as it has rebuilt its business in the face of intense
competition in the browser market from Microsoft. Netcenter is
the default start page for Netscape's browsers, and since many
Web users never change this setting, the site gets a great deal of
traffic.

"This puts to rest any doubts about AOL's ability to compete in
the Internet space," said Hambrecht & Quist analyst Paul
Noglows.

Sun, meanwhile, sees Netscape's browser as a vital conduit to
distribute its Java programming language, which many Microsoft
competitors hope to use as an alternative to the Windows
operating system. Microsoft also distributes Java in its own
browser, but has been trying to promote a proprietary variant that
triggered a bitter legal battle with Sun.