SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (42118)11/23/1998 2:43:00 PM
From: Yousef  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571643
 
Paul,

Re: "The K7 had NO RAMBUS support ... The K7 reportedly had a back side
L2 bus speed of only 1/3 the CPU speed ... The K7 DID NOT HAVE a 200 MHz
front Side bus"

This appears to have been a very "mediocre" COMDEX for AMD. BTW Paul,
who reported (prior to the Demo) that the K7 would have a 200 MHZ front
side bus ?? <hint,hint ... wink,wink>

Make It So,
Yousef



To: Paul Engel who wrote (42118)11/23/1998 2:45:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571643
 
Paul,
RE:"My guess is that the COMDEX DEMO reality set in:

The K7 had NO RAMBUS support - Intel's Camino DEMO did.

The K7 reportedly had a back side L2 bus speed of only 1/3 the CPU
speed. Not good - perfromance will suffer badly.

The K7 DID NOT HAVE a 200 MHz front Side bus - as has been
reported prior to the DEMO.

Ergo, AMD's K7 has a long way to go before it is ready for "prime time".

Sharpy was demoed at 400 MHz - not 450 MHz. Again, not too
encouraging."...

You give these Analysts way too much credit if you think they can weigh all that... They ain't that smart...they don't know a BUS from a RAM...
As for Sharpy...I think it will scale with the K6-2 so 400 is tops for now...
The other thing I heard at the fronton was that the K7 was actually running faster than 500MHz....but can't verify it...
Regards, Jim



To: Paul Engel who wrote (42118)11/23/1998 2:50:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571643
 
Re: "The K7 reportedly had a back side L2 bus speed of only 1/3 the CPU speed. Not good - perfromance will suffer badly."

You're right Paul. I hear that the backside L2 will only run at 1/3 the processor speed on the earliest K7s. But the 200 Mhz spec is also true. Do the math:

K7 will be introduced at 600 MHz.

I think the reason that AMD isn't doing half speed backside L2 is that they anticipate a lack of availability of cost effective SRAMs capable of 300 MHz operation.

Have a nice day,

Kevin



To: Paul Engel who wrote (42118)11/23/1998 3:02:00 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571643
 
Paul,

The K7 reportedly had a back side L2 bus speed of only 1/3 the CPU speed. Not good - perfromance will suffer badly

Not necessarily, because:

1. K7 has a large L1.
2. Bandwidth from the L2 is almost meaningless in single processor systems.
3. The L2 bus is undoubtably pipelined.

Scumbria