Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Donner Minerals (DML.V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 1king who wrote (9654)	11/24/1998 2:42:00 PM
From: VAUGHN	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 11676

Thanks 1king Read your post twice before it all became clear. If I followed you correctly, then the disseminated sulfides are typically the initial mineralizing event which often have higher Ni ratios and may at times produce small amounts of massive which are rarely economic. Large massive sulphide deposits are typically reworked or remobilized products of disseminated sulphide deposits that have been subjected to some secondary heat source. Is that correct? All the above being correct, why would DML be looking for massive associated with the root or stem of the original gabro intrusion as opposed to looking for it where the gneiss was faulted and/or cupped? The reason I was asking about the NiCu ratios was that it seemed as if many of the Cu ratios in the reported semi-massive intersections were elevated similar to the "pots-n-pans" intersection, but again, no mention of PGE's. I look forward to reading your analysis of the 3D geometry. Regards.