SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Voice-on-the-net (VON), VoIP, Internet (IP) Telephony -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (1984)11/27/1998 2:27:00 PM
From: Stephen B. Temple  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3178
 
infonet gets serious about ip telephony

November 27, 1998

EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, U.S.A.,: In
parallel with linking up with Networks
Telephone Corp.(NTC) to develop its global
voice-over-IP (Internet protocol)
technology, Infonet has announced it is now
providing secure Internet access for more
than 100 multinationals around the world.

The linkup with NTC will, the firm says, allow
it to develop Internet telephony applications
for use by its customers.

"NTC's integrated suite of VoIP services
enables us to leapfrog the competition,
entering quickly the growing global IP voice
market with a ready-to- use solution,"
explained Jose Collazo, Infonet's president.

According to Collazo, using the new service,
Infonet's new and existing clients will be able
to place telephone calls just as they would
normally. NTC will delivers the call to any
phone, logs its duration and generate a billing
statement in real time, passing it along to
Infonet to bill to the customer company.

On the global front, Infonet says that it now
has dedicated and dial access points of
presence (PoPs) on its network in 59
countries around the world.

According to Bob DaGiau, the firm's vice
president of global intranet marketing,
Infonet's global frame relay and global IP
gateway services have enabled customers to
obtain access to applications that run across
both the public Internet and within their own
corporate intranets.

"In 1991, Infonet recognized that our
multinational clients required that their frame
relay and IP-based intranets required secure,
reliable access to the Internet, so we
implemented our gateways then. As
e-commerce and extranets become more of a
requirement for our clients, we will continue
to enhance and evolve our gateway
services," he explained.

As reported last week by Newsbytes, Infonet
is now offering an international
voice-over-data service that has a fixed
price structure.

The new flat-rate tariff is known as the
Global MultiMedia Service (GMS) data-
telephony service and offers users a single
monthly charge based on customer
organization's expected usage and country of
origin for calls.

By switching to a flat-rate tariff system,
Infonet says that customers can expect to
pay less overall for their voice-over-IP
services, even when taking into account
existing low-cost pay-as-you-go voice
services.



To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (1984)11/27/1998 2:46:00 PM
From: Stephen B. Temple  Respond to of 3178
 
Interesting comments about the AOL / Netscape deal: Internet landscape shifts as a result of Netscape-AOL deal

November 27, 1998

InfoWorld Electric:
America Online's acquisition of Netscape
Communications last week, along with a broad
alliance with Sun Microsystems, significantly alters
the global Internet-commerce terrain, albeit with
plenty of new fault lines.

Major unresolved issues resulting from the
proposed alliance include system-integration
hurdles; the creation of a viable software
architecture across a patchwork of products from
Netscape and Sun; potentially confused channel
strategies; and unclear relationships with potential
partners such as IBM, Oracle, and Novell. In
addition, the alliance is likely to draw a concerted
response from an embattled, yet still powerful,
Microsoft that now has something specific on
which to focus.

But if AOL's brand and global reach can be
cemented with Netscape's Netcenter portal
technology -- while Sun and Netscape
simultaneously combine to create a truly
integrated product strategy -- then the deal has
the potential to be one of the most important in
the history of the industry.

"Conceptually, we have a good deal. The devil is
in the details," said Tim Sloane, an analyst at the
Aberdeen Group, in Boston.

"If all of this happens, we may have two centers
of power -- AOL and Microsoft," added David
Marshak, an analyst at the Patricia Seybold Group,
in Boston. "This balances the power, and that's
key to business people. It helps to assure that
one or the other doesn't completely dominate."

But other analysts are worried that AOL plus
Netscape still doesn't equal an enterprise-class
provider.

"I would not go to AOL to manage my
mission-critical messaging system, " said Anne
Thomas, an analyst at the Patricia Seybold Group.

Nonetheless, the shared goals of Sun and AOL
should help to accelerate the acceptance of
enterprise-class I-commerce via Sun's technology,
promote new classes of client devices, and speed
the development of new corporate portal
strategies for the Internet, AOL companies
officials said.

The deal requires shareholder and regulatory
approval, which will likely take at least 90 days.
Once approved, the new triumvirate of AOL,
Netscape, and Sun said they will offer
"end-to-end" services and products for both ISPs
and large businesses.

That kind of simplified approach appeals to some
users.

"I would consider this new alliance a very
formidable one, and we would certainly look in
their direction as we develop our plans," said
Frank Petersmark, assistant vice president of
information technologies at Amerisure & Co., in
Farmington Hills, Mich.

But others questioned the validity of
vendor-specific approaches, such as this alliance,
to electronic commerce given the reach of IBM,
Hewlett-Packard, and Electronic Data Systems
(EDS).

"There's one piece missing. The e-commerce game
is becoming less one of development and more one
of integration. As companies develop sites, the
key question is integration of their e-commerce
site into back-end systems," said Andrew Bartels,
a research analyst for e-commerce at the Giga
Information Group, in Cambridge, Mass. "IBM is
very strong in that area, and the so-called 'dream
team' of HP and Cisco with EDS are also building
up strength in that position. The name of the
game lies in integration."

In addition to the broad implications for
I-commerce, the alliance also has important
implications for the continued evolution of Java as
a platform. Sun and Netscape said they will jointly
develop new Java browser clients for PC and
Web-enabled devices.

"The deal guarantees to ISVs that if you write
Java applications, there will be a Java client
there," said Bill Raduchel, Sun's chief strategy
officer, in Palo Alto, Calif.

The deal does bode well for Java, agreed an
executive at a large systems vendor.

"This gives me renewed confidence that there's a
high-volume distribution vehicle for Java on the
client. Not only on Windows, but on all the
devices, " the executive said.

But another Java licensee also expressed concerns
that the deal may provide a distraction from Sun's
Java and Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB) development
efforts.

"I think that the group doing EJB and Java will not
be affected by this merger," said David Skok,
chairman and founder of SilverStream Software, in
Burlington, Mass. "Having said that, the senior
management at Sun would be in a distracted
mode; they have to change their business."

<
[Copyright 1998, InfoWorld]