SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : KCAP - Key Capital Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DrProficient who wrote (365)11/24/1998 9:39:00 AM
From: Poet  Respond to of 459
 
I think you have mistaken intelligence for duplicity, "Dr P.". I told you from the beginning that your name-calling was offensive and (if you truly have any psychiatric training) in violation of APA ethical standards. I told you that my intention was to check your credentials and report you to the APA if you are registered as a member. Your not having provided them to me tells one of two things: either you are lying about being a psychiatrist, or you are aware of your violations of American Psychiatric Association standards and are too cowardly to face censure.

As for the research on cross gender brain function you cite, you are laughably incorrect about making those inferences from that (rather old) data. So much for your keeping "on-topic" here, huh?

By the way, I think you might have meant "school counselors" instead of "school consolers".

your bihemispherical nemesis,
Poet



To: DrProficient who wrote (365)11/24/1998 9:59:00 AM
From: Len  Respond to of 459
 
Facts to ponder:

#1- I see now....You have "racked up millions in internet stocks," and you "have better things to do with your time," yet you waste time on a thread of a dollar stock. Yep, that's the behavior of a sophisticated investor, I see it clearly now. Also, you seem to find the time to write extensive posts, but somehow don't think the minute that it takes to proofread them, not to mention that SI TELLS you your mistakes, isn't relevant. Unfortunately for you, you are what you post here on SI, and thus are judged on what you say, and how you say it. Multiple spelling and syntax errors, far from "going over some people's head," actually give all an indication of the kind of professional you must have been, if you really were one. Surely, someone of your stature, or should I say, your PRESUMED stature, would care about how they are perceived, especially after being called on those errors. Your after the fact defense only shows more of the arrogance of which you have become noteworthy.

#2- Poet is intelligent enough to see through you, which is all that anyone needs. I'd bet she could run circles around you, DrArrogance. Now, let's deal with facts...you have acted totally unprofessionally, and have violated tenets of your profession. Either you have, or you haven't. If you haven't, then certainly you would not be afraid of her reporting you, as you could defend yourself well, correct? But, if you have, then her reporting you would be justified, no? Therefore, your refusal to comply can only mean that you admit that you have done so, and thus don't dare give up the information. Far from others being that dumb, you have shown everyone just what kind of professional you really are. Case closed.

#3- Uh-huh, and contemptuously assuming that NO ONE could have "helped more young adults positively........" as much as you have, again shows you for the arrogant misfit that you are. I truly wonder why you don't like yourself so much, that you stoop to belittling others with so much venom.

#4- You have that kind of power and wealth, with one phone call, to drive this stock to over $10.00? Wow, and to think you waste your time with us peons? How nice of you to grace us with your presence. I think I may hurl. You are full of it, and we all know it.

#5- Hmm, why don't you go find a thread that is populated by a certain minority, and post some drivel about how the Bell Curve proves this and that. Got the guts for that? It's easy to hide behind the keyboard, and the anonymity the net affords, isn't it?

#6- Why go on, since I need to get to trading? Suffice it to say, that you are an interesting piece of work, and would do yourself a favor to search inside that skewed mind of yours, and find out why you feel the need to talk down to everyone, not to mention your lack of honesty. Speaking of reading a book, "How to Win Friends and Influence People" comes to mind. It calls out for your attention. By the way, if you are so sure of yourself, why not ignore any off-topic post, and concentrate only on KCAP, like you said you would? Is it because you care too much about what people think of you, that you just can't? Methinks so.

Len



To: DrProficient who wrote (365)11/24/1998 12:10:00 PM
From: Rick Faurot  Respond to of 459
 
DP,

So now you want to limit this thread to stock info only? Gee, where did all this debate start? Wasn't it all about you making bogus psychiatric observations about other traders on this thread? Is that your idea of stock information? If so, you are just plain deluded.

You think insults and attacks should be handed only via PMs? Fine with me. You follow this policy and so will I. Do what you say you think is right, and this whole off-topic discussion will go away.

Rick



To: DrProficient who wrote (365)11/24/1998 12:14:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 459
 
What is this, dictated but not read?:"I spend very little time proof reading my postings because I have better things to do" If you have better things to do go away. You are so full of sheet it is incredible. There is now way that you manage the money that you say or imply that you do. And your implication that you helped so many children has to a croc as well as you are probably the most despised person on SI.



To: DrProficient who wrote (365)11/25/1998 7:14:00 AM
From: Don Pueblo  Respond to of 459
 
Excellent points, Pustule. I never doubted that you were really a psychiatrist. I wish to address each of your points at length, but the market calls, so I will have to return later. How is your assignment progressing? Don't forget the light socket.

BTW, does the phrase "SJB on LSD" mean anything to you?



To: DrProficient who wrote (365)11/26/1998 6:18:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo  Respond to of 459
 
Re: your points 3, 4 and 6; you, sir, are a damned liar.



To: DrProficient who wrote (365)11/27/1998 10:40:00 AM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 459
 
As with many things, Dr. Dementia, you thought wrong and then lied about it anyway: "I thought that I was joining an investor forum and not a chat room. I have witnessed on this thread an 80% non-stock related posting average."

SI is by and large chart and chat and you know, from your vast knowledge of psychology, that there are many sheep just waiting to be shorn. You are attempting to do just that. Your arrogance and crap have attracted the attention of people who despise your ilk and we'll haunt you to your grave. So that's why 80% of this thread is non-stock related. (It is us your fan club taking swipes at your bs at every turn)



To: DrProficient who wrote (365)11/27/1998 8:57:00 PM
From: Phil(bullrider)  Respond to of 459
 
Dr. P.,

If your average price per share on this POS is $1.30, you have another excellent chance to average down and lose even more of the millions you have made in the market.

Have fun,
Phil

P.S. Keep posting. This is excellent comic relief.