SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Silkroad -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Regis McConnell who wrote (127)11/24/1998 10:36:00 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Respond to of 626
 
What a refreshing set of views. Welcome aboard, in case no one else has stated so.

Keep an eye on ahhaha for me while I'm gone, gonna be busy over the next day or so. I wouldn't want him going too mytho on us... or is it you we must now be watchful of?

I note from your profile that you are interested in Mythology, ,..literature, astrology, transpersonal psychology, archetypal art, music, dream work. You've no need to convince me, at least, of this. I think you've already presented your arguments quite nicely. But don't stop posting.

Re: The BCR article, I have the hard copy in my brief, I suppose I should read it now. Later.



To: Regis McConnell who wrote (127)11/24/1998 12:11:00 PM
From: ahhaha  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 626
 
My attempts to clarify have to be considered a failure or like Einstein's view of Quantum Mechanics, have to be considered as incomplete. The debate between Einstein and Bohr has been continued for the rest of the century and now has gotten to the point that the current basis of Quantum Mechanics, eigenvector subspaces in the Hilbert Space representing physical states, has to be considered incomplete and needs an extension so that non-locality and the loss of classical causality can be resolved. The problem was never in equating operator space with Hamiltonian momentum space, rather it was the simplistic equating of momentum space to the unphysical eigenvector representation, a categorical error, that causes the problems exposed in the EPR Paradox and the failure of Bell's inequalities.

In SR we have a similar error. It is like equating devils and angels because they are both spiritual entities or referring to humans as either because humans seem to have spiritual properties. In the Newtonian world there is only one time dimension. In Special Relativity we realize there are at least two, one co-moving or rest frame and the other, in motion. The Twin Paradox makes the two times clearly evident in the Newtonian world of perception. I have used the two time variable approach to characterize SR, but haven't done a good job. It makes sense to junk this way to simplify because it hasn't worked.

It would be of help if I knew more of the details in the SR design. I guess this is the complaint of the engineers. It's hard to believe something without pertinent detail. I have received email indicating that there is investigation going on with the intent of product claim verification from outside interests. Maybe in this investigation the categorical errors will surface, because I believe we have in SR a substantially different way of laser data encoding which is based on WDM, but actually requires a quantum mechanical explanation rather than a field theoretic one.