Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dean Fontana who wrote (14967)	11/24/1998 11:47:00 AM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 34075

That is pure conjecture and cannot be supported by fact. The addition of Alaska and Denver I presume is to support " I have been around Mines and done some mining, let me tell you what I saw made the RED Dog mine in Alaska look like a sand box of placer dust! " You then add "sources" so people wil assume your sources are credible because you name dropped Alaska denver and previous mining experience!! If that is the case then why has GE not been able to garnish enough interest to be able to remove the caveat from its 8k or 8ka that this may never be developed! Basically "give some hope to GE investors"??? Please don't use the SEC conspiracy theory as a liklihood...thats old bull! As devils advocate I bet scwabb, prudential, and every other investment company is holding alot of orders they have promised but not actually bought, they are playing the odds and they will loose. These type of statements are used by many to hide facts!! People want to believe there is a master conspiracy preventing them from becoming filthy stinking rich! You are just contributing to that hogwash!! The next aproach is "register your shares" because of the "master conspiracy of shorters"!! I watch and listen to this everyday and none of it can be supported by fact!! It never ceases to amaze me people will throw money at something like this. You say your "investors" are staying pat till the end! My response is that they are not investors they are gamblers! Don't try to add credibility to your gamble by attempting to promote this stock with name drops like Alaska and you have mined before, unless of course you care to share specifics ie. 1) concentration of the sample you saw 2) was it in an alluvial pool where concentration will obviously higher 3) Your mining experience would allow you conjecture as to continuity...care to state it for the record? or just lead people on! Come on, lets here some meat!! the Chief