Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ARP - V Argentina Gold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (1355)	11/25/1998 6:30:00 AM
From: Check	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3282

Still grappling with 89 and 90. Prior to getting your and Claude Cormier's response,(#1339 & #1355) I emailed the company to congrat. them on the nice promo and question the deficiency of their website maps. According to Sophia, "Hole 90 is located at the mid-point between Holes 80 and 84 but 50 metres east of the high resistivity zone." Now if 89 was drilled from the same platform as 88 and it was mineralized from 67 to 332 meters, wouldn't we have quite a bit of "splash" and "tonnage" added? Or am I just kidding myself because I bought back in near the close? I mean, if they really had a 265 m intercept in 89, why the heck wouldn't they report it so? Too clever for their own good? Check it out