To: Dorine Essey who wrote (82171 ) 11/24/1998 3:21:00 PM From: jbn3 Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 176387
re Insider Trading PostMessage 6550563 Dorine, My apologies if this article was posted previously. I have been on vacation and there are over 10,000 unread posts, so I am not sure what has and has not been posted. I am trying to catch up on what I would have posted, had I been here. However, I suspect that you err in stating that it has been posted, because I think that I am the only one who takes the effort to retype the articles from the Austin paper. I may be mistaken, so if you could provide the relevant posts, I'd appreciate it. As far as your comment, "Why would you repost this now? We need posative posts" , I've explained why I am posting now. Notice that I did not consider the post either positive or negative, and the only editorial comment I provided was a "DELLish, 3" signature. More to the point, I view the function of this thread as 1) providing the greatest possible amount of data about the stock (DELL) which may bear upon its near- and long-term future market performance; 2) to do so as factually and logically as possible; 3) to present logically our opinions about events and probable impact on the stock price; 4)and to discuss logically and civilly our differing opinions. I am certain that it is not in the best interests of this or any thread to present only 'positive' or 'negative' data. At the point where we begin to hedge or slant our input one way or the other, we become indistinguishable from the scam artists we so thoroughly detest. As you are probably aware, I have been contributing less to the thread than I used to for various reasons: chief among them has been an increasing tendency towards incivility coupled with an intolerance of differing opinions. If the thread considers my attempt to provide factual data without spin to be inappropriate, then I can certainly abide by that sentiment. Respectfully, DELLish, 3.