To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (22533 ) 11/24/1998 3:18:00 PM From: mark silvers Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 39621
Emile LOL, man can you try and twist words and obfuscate the truth. In a weird way, I commend you. I dont deny the existence of the talmud. I never did. I deny its existence as you know it. Now, lets use a little common sense. Your comment about denying Jesus Chrsit is silly in its use of logic. You are try to get people to believe that there is a some evil cabal aimed at discrediting Jesus. what you are really saying is this; Jews dont believe in Jesus. Really? how shocking? Neither do Muslims, Hindus, Jains, Bhuddists, or any other non-christian religion. All these people believe in their own version of god, and they didnt need the Talmud to get there. What you say is akin to the following(also nonsense) The bible is an evil document, full of lies and distortions, it is the Devil's work becasue it teaches people not to beieve in (allah, buddah, Micheal Jordan, whatever)Lets use your own words..... <<You are getting a little better at obfuscating the truth. You once tried to deny the existence of the Talmud(Bible) and its central use in establishing the doctrines of modern antichrist(anti-jewish) Judiasim(Christianity). Now you are a bit more clever. You simply say that you never heard its teachings.>> We can plug in any two religions that believe differently, and get the same twisted result. It is not an attempt to hate the other, but to TEACH THE LEARNINGS AND PHILOSOPHIES OF WHAT THEY BELIEVE. TO DENY THEM THAT RIGHT AS YOU ATTEMPT, IS TO DENY FREEDOM OF RELIGION. <<Where do Jews in general acquire a negative attitude about Jesus and Christianity? >> the same reality holds true here. believing in your own religion is not the same as learning a negative attitude about another. It is completely different. One could say the same thing about christianity. wWhere do these Satanic christians learn to acquire a negative atitude about Jews? It mus be that Satanic anti-jewish new testament. I agree that statement is ridiculous. but no less ridiculous than yours. Mark