Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SKIP PAUL who wrote (18742)	11/24/1998 10:10:00 PM
From: Ruffian	Respond to of 152472

Skip, It was on First Call, not privie to Us<eom> Regards Michael

To: SKIP PAUL who wrote (18742)	11/25/1998 10:17:00 AM
From: mmeggs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

The gist of his research note -- it was not a full report -- is that the dispute between Q and ETRI could spill over in to the decision over which standard to use for 3g. For background, the agreement between Q and ETRI was that Q would share 20% of royalties genereated from sales of cellular equipment in Korea. Q has chosen to exclude PCS royalties from that agreement. ETRI feels it has the right to its cut of those royalties as well. I know Gregg has posted that the contract specifically delineates "cellular" as that which is subject to roylaties. Just one more reason to hate Qualcomm, I guess. Regards, mmeggs