SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (69084)11/25/1998 11:52:00 AM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul, Re: "If their existing systems were "SO STABLE", why did they have to think about
UPTIME and SYSTEM PROBLEMS EVERY MORNING ?"

Not sure exactly what that means, but MTBFs of S390 systems are now quoted in terms of decades. 100,000 hours, which is more than ten years, was passed by IBM CMOS machines a while ago. They're measuring upwards of 20 years now. Of course, that's calculated, based on a few thousand machines' statistics, individually measured in terms of MTBF over periods like 13 or 26 weeks. The servers we talk about here are really in their infancy WRT reliability. I like the way Intel and their alliance partners are addressing RAS, including system management over the network, hardware redundancy, failover, etc., but it's just a start.

Tony



To: Paul Engel who wrote (69084)11/25/1998 12:07:00 PM
From: John Koligman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul - No system is PERFECT, it's just that the MVS systems stay up better than others. I have a pretty good feel for how much effort and how many years it took to get MVS to where it is. I have a feeling it will be some time before those 35 million lines of code in Windows 2000 get to the same place...

Problems don't necessarily mean crashes (except in the Microsoft world <ggg>), they mean jobs abending, they mean someone setting parms wrong, they mean jobs not running correctly due to tuning problems, etc. etc. When you are dealing with multiple datacenters and multiple mainframes servicing ten of thousands of users, you will have problems. The key is that they are generally *NOT* of the 'system down' variety...