Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mick who wrote (6966)	11/25/1998 9:39:00 PM
From: Famularo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7966

>>>Is it not to Ashton's advantage to have this play on it's death bed? <<< News mean different things to different people with different agendas. The numbers for K14 may prove to be good in finding a mine for someone interested in finding a mine with an inventory of a few pipes, but not for investors looking for a good bounce in the near term. >>>It takes millions to explore, if their JV partners have to come up with six figures, PUG would have trouble coming up with it, n'est pas? not sure about Alberta Energy. I certainly don't want to cast aspersions on anyone I don't know. But knowing human nature, trying to squeeze the minor partner is a possible scenario.<<< Possibly, it has been discussed so many times on this thread. It is a question that companies with a determined agenda dictated by parent companies, Ashton Australia and Malaysia Mining will always deny. I need help with my picks. Det and Dal tomorrow? regards Fast Frank

To: Mick who wrote (6966)	11/25/1998 9:46:00 PM
From: JP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7966

<<trying to squeeze the minor partner is a possible scenario.>> You are showing your Eastern roots -where is Toronto anyway?(LOL) Alberta Energy can spend as much drilling a couple of wells as ACA has spent in Alberta. They don't get squeezed by little ACA. PUG is of course a different story. JP