SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeuspaul who wrote (3743)11/26/1998 4:17:00 PM
From: AreWeThereYet  Respond to of 14778
 
I believe VA = Watt * 1.4.

I don't have time to dig up the textbook to verify but I am 80% certain about that.

aC



To: Zeuspaul who wrote (3743)11/26/1998 7:42:00 PM
From: Howard R. Hansen  Respond to of 14778
 
I thought Watts = Volts x Amps ( W=VA ) ie 600 VA = 600 watts. Am I misunderstanding something?

For sinusoidial signals Watts = Volts x Amps x Cos( theta ). Where theta is the phase shift between the voltage and current wave forms. However, the current drawn by a computer is rarely a sinusoidial signal and in this case the calculation of watts is a lot more complicated. But in any case the power used by a computer will be significantly less than what is given by a multiplying volts times amps and the rating of the UPS should be based on VA, (Volts x Amps) not watts.



To: Zeuspaul who wrote (3743)11/26/1998 11:25:00 PM
From: Spots  Respond to of 14778
 
Watts vs Volt-Amps

ZP, somehow I think you got more than you bargained for <gg>.

So, how about some more?

In a purely resistive circuit, watts (power) is equal to
volts x amps. However, introduce inductance (coils,
transformers) and capacitance (well, capacitors), and
the circuit has other forms of impedence which, though
measured in ohms like resistance, do not in themselves
draw net power (** see below). Nevertheless, inductive
and capacitive impedences, do
place higher voltage and current loads on the source
of power. In a sense, even though the power supply will
get it back, it has to supply it up front. The
ratio of Watts/VA is called the power factor, which
in a purely resistive circuit is 1. That's your toaster.
Add transformers (inductances) and ripple filters (capacitors)
and etc, and you add non-resistive impedences that will
reduce the power factor.

Public power companies are required to deliver AC power
that is very close to a power factor of 1 (within a fraction
of a percent). I don't know what the power factor of a
good PC power supply is, but I would expect that it is
also pretty close to one (the cheaper the lower, probably).

Apparently the switching UPSs run a net capacitive load
which reduces the power factor to approximately .7.
I'm no electrical engineer, but I can see that it would
be a lot harder to filter and smooth essentially
square or stepped waves from a battery without
introducing net non-resistive impedence, because these
impedences are frequency sensitive. A square wave (eg)
has lots of different sine wave frequencies in it
(all the odd ones, actually),
so the impedence of the ciruit would net out much
different than if you fed a single-frequency sine
wave into it.

Anyhow, the fairly standard .7 power factor for UPSs
has to be applied to figure the capacity.

Sorry, again went on way too long.

Spots

(**) Technical aside -- these impedences do take energy (power)
from the circuit during parts of the AC cycle, store it
temporarily in electric (capacitance) or magnetic (inductance)
fields then give it back during other parts of the cycle.