To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (42278 ) 11/27/1998 1:04:00 PM From: Paul Engel Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572470
Kevin - Re: "Exactly my point--so did AMD." I believe that is incorrect. AMD licensed MMX from Intel - under a ROYALTY Licensing Agreement. Intel gets a small payment for every K6/K6-2/K6-3 made and sold with MMX inside it. Paul {=============================================} AMD's SEC 10Q FIling - April, 1997 SEC-DOCUMENT>0001012870-97-000533.txt : 19970321
<SEC-HEADER>0001012870-97-000533.hdr.sgml : 19970321
ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001012870-97-000533
CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K
PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 12
CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19961229
FILED AS OF DATE: 19970320
SROS: NYSE
FILER:
COMPANY DATA:
COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000002488
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SEMICONDUCTORS & RELATED DEVICES [3674]
IRS NUMBER: 941692300
STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE
FISCAL YEAR END: 1227
FILING VALUES:
FORM TYPE: 10-K
SEC ACT: 1934 Act
SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-07882
FILM NUMBER: 97559929
On January 11, 1995, the Company and Intel reached an agreement to settle
all previously outstanding legal disputes between the two companies. As part
of the settlement, in December 1995, the Company signed a five-year,
comprehensive cross-license agreement with Intel which expires on December 31,
2000. The agreement provides that after December 20, 1999, the parties will
negotiate in good faith a patent cross-license agreement to be effective
January 1, 2001. Effective January 1, 1996, the new agreement gives the
Company and Intel the right to use each others' patents and certain
copyrights, including copyrights to the x86 instruction sets but excluding
other microprocessor microcode copyrights beyond the Intel 486(TM) processor
code. The cross-license is royalty-bearing for the Company's products that use
certain Intel technologies. The Company is required to pay Intel minimum non-
refundable royalties during the years 1997 through 2000.