Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (16275)	11/27/1998 2:43:00 AM
From: aleta	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

Besides, anyone investing in this company would do so precisely because it is a growing company... If it remains a growing company and that's assuming that it actually is one. For me it is no longer a good investment, even as a daytrade, in light of one of the reasons they were delisted. The "in the public interest" part really bothers me most. To me that means there was some sort of possible fraud taking place. If it is taking place in one company then it is taking place in the other because it's being run by the same people. If the fraud is found to be a fact then the SEC could shut down trading in either or both in a heart beat. It's just too dangerous, IMO, to daytrade until this delisting thing is resolved.

To: PartyTime who wrote (16275)	11/27/1998 7:16:00 AM
From: BlueFox	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 18444

Besides, anyone investing in this company would do so precisely because it is a growing company and not one which has already achieved pubity. Growing? 38MM 1997 to what in 1998? Far less. We can be pretty sure that measuring this quarter, in which there was no service for a while, against the previous quarter will show a continued shrinking of sales and customer base. That is not growing. In a sector where investors expect to see 30-50% growth per quarter, they'll be real shy of a company that is shrinking. So if the ESVS/ZULU consortium continues to grow in OTC Land, the ex-SIMer piece of the pie gets smaller and smaller in terms of its force of representation in the larger picture. Doesn't it? Huh? Basic math PT: if they own 5% or 50% of the company, it doesn't matter what size it is, they still have the same representation. The only way for the "ex-SIMer" to be screwed is to screw all ZULU shareholders. Remember, the ex-SIMers could only protest what involved ZuluMedia, not what involved Zulu-tek. Why? They hold ZULU preferred shares. BF