Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Donner Minerals (DML.V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 1king who wrote (9845)	11/27/1998 10:20:00 AM
From: The Osprey	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11676

The loosener came off of the tightener and wound up on the slackener eventually tightening the loosener and refilling the slack.Geee......Just joking guys and gals.I think...... I am beginning to follow some of your posts.Very educational and shows dummies like me the more complex side of mining and the complexities of exploration and the different factors that come into play. I especially liked this....So one must look for ore where it is most likely to occur not where it is "easier" to explore, so to speak. Once again good job guys. We should be so lucky to have experts who know their stuff. I will be interested to see your final interpretation of the DML/NAI results on the samples that were not selected for release. I.E.-Dirt or otherwise. Regards Osprey

To: 1king who wrote (9845)	11/27/1998 11:49:00 AM
From: Sam	Respond to of 11676

Apreciate the input in your post IK .If I keep following you around I might become a Geo-lo-gist yet or something bought some BII wed.,just patten myself on the back with every trade goin by ,darn it Jimsy talking that way becomes habit forming .. thankyou sam

To: 1king who wrote (9845)	11/27/1998 2:37:00 PM
From: VAUGHN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11676

Hello 1king Thank you for you very interesting reply. 1. I assumed that since the O&G companies over here could routinely do seismic over vast areas of boreal forest, that it would not be all that onerous in Labrador. Was not aware of the logistical problem, but in light of what has and will be spent on blind drilling, that technique might take on economic parameters. 2. Actually that was my point, but I guess I did not say it very clearly. My assumption is that the feeder system (tree trunk) passes through the lower gneiss horizon before it deposits the disseminated sulphides in the upper gabro/troctolite ceiling. If any massive sulphide deposit will likely be found associated with the "tree trunk" and the gneiss is relatively un-noisey for want of a better term, wouldn't an EM or GPR survey conducted in the gneiss probing for tree trunks at that level be logical? Presumably, the only significant conductors at that level would be feeder zones and massive sulphide stringers. Does that make any sense? 3. I gather you are not aware whether Teck is using these textural/magnetic flow pattern techniques at SVB, is that correct? Perhaps a whisper in some one's ear? Thanks again. Regards