Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rupert1 who wrote (37669)	11/27/1998 3:08:00 PM
From: Elwood P. Dowd	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 97611

Victor... I was just getting ready to say that! jajajajajaja El

To: rupert1 who wrote (37669)	11/28/1998 12:27:00 AM
From: Kenya AA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

Vepoc and Pruguy, Both technical analysis and fundamental analysis are totally subjective. I've never cared for Dorsey Wright's analysis and today I really think he was smokin' something - except for his comments on DELL. I believe he uses point and figure charting exclusively. I know very little about P&F except that it has something to do with plotting supply and demand on a graph. On the surface it would seem to be a logical way to assess a situation, but maybe he's not putting his Xs and Os in the right squares. They used to have a P&F analyst on Squawk sometimes named Louise Yamato. She made some better calls, but she dealt more with sector analysis. I agree with you that a lot of TA is mumbo-jumbo - look at Jerry Favors. I have no idea what he's talking about. IMO about 30% of what most technical analysts say makes some kind of sense and the other 70% is garbage. But, you know I could say the same thing about the fundamental analysts - The economic crisis is over. The economic crisis is just starting. PC sales are slowing. PC sales are growing. CPQ's great. CPQ sucks. And the economists . . . . K