Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Janice and Ellen Discuss Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (17)	11/27/1998 5:22:00 PM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 308

Nip ankles? Are you trying to say "your record" isn't important? You like to flaunt it, so I thought surely you'd want to address these points. Here ya go - #reply-6580432

To: Janice Shell who wrote (17)	11/27/1998 5:41:00 PM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 308

Here, I'll even make it more convenient for you - To: Angusb (13268 ) From: Ellen Friday, Nov 27 1998 1:29AM ET Reply # of 13280 At least we're groupies of a Goddess and international sex symbol (one with a pretty good track record at picking out scams too) You say Janice is a...a...sex symbol?? Oooookaaayyyyy... So, what's this "record"? 3 scams? 2 scams? 4 scams? Doesn't really matter. Picking them out from BB stocks isn't all that hard, now is it? Odds are that, oh, probably 8 or 9 out of 10 will be anyway. So what's all the broohaha about? No great feat of glory really, considering the odds. I do know this. She & some of you groupies, looking at the flip side, can't seem to be able to distinguish when one isn't. No credibility in that respect for you "groupies". I learned from my experience with RMIL. And I've picked one that isn't a scam. Some of you visited (stalked is more accurate) and got caught with the proverbial pants down. Bugs the hell out of some of you too. Don't understand though, why you guys don't spend your time more wisely and "go after" those who are, say, out there spamming & such. Plenty of them to be found on SI. By not doing that it only emphasizes even more that it is personal (as in vendetta) for you all and not stock-related, as you purport. Whoops! Even more holes shot in your credibility. Wow, that credibility shrinks more and more each day. You, in contrast, seem to be a groupie of a less savory type of individual (and most certainly not a diety). Guess you don't comprehend what you read either, like the others in your group. I'm not a groupie of or with anybody. I suppose since you all travel in a pack, there's a reason for that. Can't stand alone? Can't cut the mustard alone? It is my sincerest wish that you would turn some of your natural questioning tendencies to questions of aninvestment rather than personal nature. Now THAT'S a really strange statement to come from a groupie whose group is obsessed with the "personal nature". Geez. Guess you don't read the posts made by your own group, huh? It's even MORE strange, because I'd even requested information from the stalkers (plural) and guess what? THEY HAD NONE. (Also, refer to the above paragraphs) BTW Dr. Shell doesn't require us to cower. You misunderstood. The meaning was that she "expects" those she enjoys attacking to cower. Too bad though, not gonna happen. (well.....yeah.., we have to grovel from time to time but Cower - NEVER!!!) Now THAT was funny!! Good one.