SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom D who wrote (28352)11/27/1998 7:24:00 PM
From: llamaphlegm  Respond to of 164684
 
<<< It would imply that at least one bull was actually listening to some bears
on this thread. It would be unprecedented.
>>>

Tom:

I'm shocked. I should probably check my in box more often. Will do so now -- don't burn me in effigy when it shoots up another 300%. hey in this market, if ktel is valued anywhere north of $2/share, anything is possible.

LP



To: Tom D who wrote (28352)11/27/1998 7:30:00 PM
From: Rob S.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
We should all be listening to each other to figure out how to make money rather than press one point or the other - it's nice being "right" but it's much nicer having listened to opposing views and making the right decisions that in turn put money in your pocket (as opposed to "paper profits").

I wish I would have listened more to the bulls and gone with the flow. I think that the "gold rush" analogy is actually very accurate: many people are selling their "farms" to go with the stampede in pursuit of the new "Internet gold". The fact that only a handful of companies will strike it rich in the long run is not important. The gleem in speculators eyes will make the "getting there" more important for the next couple of years than what you have when you get "there". It wasn't the '49 ers who struck it rich in California but the merchants and outfitters who helped exchange their money for the chance to go after the new dream.



To: Tom D who wrote (28352)11/27/1998 11:50:00 PM
From: Gary Walker  Respond to of 164684
 
>one bull was actually listening to some bears on this thread

Dr. T, you're scaring me.....I thought this AMZN model was infallible.... :^)



To: Tom D who wrote (28352)11/28/1998 11:22:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Who knows? If LP can persuade me to lighten up my position, the implications are
staggering. It would imply that at least one bull was actually listening to some bears on
this thread. It would be unprecedented


Tom,

I tried so hard and LP had more success. He is a good man:-)

Glenn