SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Janice and Ellen Discuss Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Qone0 who wrote (94)11/28/1998 2:56:00 AM
From: EL KABONG!!!  Respond to of 308
 
Robert,

Good night. Sleep well.

KJC



To: Qone0 who wrote (94)11/28/1998 3:15:00 AM
From: marcos  Respond to of 308
 
Robert, you posted this #reply-6589855 before I said a single word here about bnez, or even thought about it, for that matter. And yes, I did know that 'reason why they don't report', but just wanted you to explain why they should be allowed to trade when they don't report even socks out. Point being - people who live in glass houses shouldn't nip ankles.

And if you're really interested in this - my bnez history goes back to when the latino vías misteriosas ['grapevine' to you] brought to my attention these posts; #reply-6555874 & #reply-6555986 ... on reading a fair bit of that thread, it was also apparent that Elio welcomed free and open speech and that laker character did not as it conflicted with his moronic junior hypester act - so I posted en castellano in support of Elio's language and position, two reasons I consider sound and fair. I did not 'attack' the stock, I expressed concern over the fact that the number of outstanding was unknown.

But hey, it's a free country - call it anything you like ....... cheers



To: Qone0 who wrote (94)11/28/1998 4:06:00 AM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 308
 
RW, you sir are a toad. That you attempt to stand up to defend a company that does not disclose the number of shares it has outstanding nor its financials is unacceptable under any circumstance, especially if you are hyping to neophytes. There are no, if and or buts about it. So quit acting like such a wounded fool and get on with your life, such as it is. That's right, I said it is indefensible.

If you don't like it go to the Yahooligan thread, they are less demanding there.



To: Qone0 who wrote (94)11/28/1998 5:28:00 PM
From: CharleyMike  Respond to of 308
 
Rudely interrupting,

Was the penultimate word UP?