To: Jon Tara who wrote (16314 ) 11/28/1998 2:47:00 PM From: PartyTime Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18444
OK, Jon. Since you're so objective, please tell me which company best fits a proper identity to match its business plan: 1) A company that has traded for a very long time on the OTC market with a name Pure Water Sciences and is into the business of land, health and videophones; or, 2) A company that has traded for little over a year on the OTC market with a name Zulu-tek and is into the business of advertising, demographic sales and marketing and ecommerce. Thus, you can understand why I think Zulu is a better bet than PRWT. But I'm open-minded. I'm willing to learn more about PRWT--and this was stated in a subsequent post (which, by the way, you failed to include in concert with the one you recently cited here). So your piecemeal approach to criticize me needs more work. But, of course, that's my own opinion. And how many times have I noted that you appear quite objective in all things non-Zulu related? And now you lodge the same criticism against me. Coup fore? Perhaps. But that's all that is. Big deal! Indeed, you are entirely against Zulu; I am willing to give it the hope of possibility. And since most start-up companies fail, you therefore hold the advantage in this. Please use it wisely and not distort what I represent. Thank you. Now, with respect to Aleta, she seems to apply NYSE/Nasdaq/AMEX standards to OTC stocks. This is illogical. Plus, I have some other problems with her standards, most of which I do not want to get into right now. You? You hate all penny stocks, which only adds further mystery to your presence on these threads. Me? I made a penny stock investment fully aware of the risks involved. Why? Because I liked what I saw in Zulu. It's really that simple. So please get off your high horse, or at least ride it somewhere else. Why don't you go Cowboy Up on a NYSE/Nasdaq/AMEX-type stock. And when Zulu comes into fruition and I move on, we'll meet again on the NYSE/Nasdaq/AMEX range. At least then perhaps we can chat about a stock we are BOTH invested in. You see, your terms here are most unfair, since you're not invested in Zulu and never have been. It's much, much easier to be condemning under those conditions, wouldn't you say? Of course, you would understand this better were you to sit in the peyote tent, breathing smoke from the fire and passing the pipe. Just kidding!