Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grainne who wrote (26314)	11/28/1998 5:37:00 PM
From: George S. Montgomery	Respond to of 108807

CGB, your quaint hypothesis about nose/ear hair was fun... But do I perceive that you are becoming adamant about it? Say it isn't so. If you, as I, reread some of our posted posts and get a teensy flush of having-been-silly, then I suggest that you don't reread this strident insistence on body-rugs insulating prehistoric geriatric satyrs. geo ps: Is this a cause worth going to the mat for?

To: Grainne who wrote (26314)	11/29/1998 1:35:00 AM
From: Krowbar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Well, I confess that I was being a little facetious about my body hair theory. But how do we explain, as somebody here pointed out, the loss of hair on our domes, if the purpose was to retain body heat. A great deal of heat is lost through the top of barren heads. Thankfully, I am keeping most of mine so far. The real question to me is why we lost the long body hair of our ancestors. We still have the hairs, but most of them remain less than fully developed, except on the head, under the arms, the brows, and the pubes. Why would we shed our hair, only to replace it with animal fur? It also makes our skin more sensitive to UV damage. Anybody got a good suggestion? Del