Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brady B. who wrote (16350)	11/29/1998 3:19:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

I was going to do that myself, Brady. Thanks for putting it head-on. Now, your words below... "By filing the lawsuit (against zulu) they put zulu in a position that it could not be used to show assets." ...are quite wrongful. There is no lawsuit. There is only the threat of a lawsuit. Is this clear yet? And this is what I've been champing my bit about. OK?

To: Brady B. who wrote (16350)	11/29/1998 3:23:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

And, furthermore, Brady, these words are inaccurate as well. There is no proven case of fraud here concerning Zulu. Why do you keep alluding to something that doesn't exist? Please note how you described what you did below: "A (allegated) fraud riddled company (zulu) has no place on a listed exchange. Until it is disproven they (zulu) should not be allowed to even touch the nasdaq board." "...fraud riddled company (zulu)...." Do you have proof of this? "Until it is disproven...." Until what is disproven, Brady?