Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Janice and Ellen Discuss Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (173)	11/29/1998 4:19:00 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 308

I'll try to wrap my brain around this. Droog also had a hard time understanding #reply-2243726 As did Mr Stark #reply-3021723 "... because of questions regarding the accuracy of statements ..."

To: Janice Shell who wrote (173)	11/29/1998 5:47:00 PM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 308

#reply-6571531 To: marcos (6040 ) From: Ellen Wednesday, Nov 25 1998 10:04PM ET Reply # of 6092 It's way past olllldddddd how you guys just keep on obsessing about RMIL. People DO learn you know. And move on. Why can't you? Many of us gained friendships there - and still post to each other there occasionally - but have moved on. How come you & yours are so stuck there? -------------------- #reply-6574499 To: marcos (6048 ) From: Ellen Thursday, Nov 26 1998 9:32AM ET Reply # of 6092 I suppose part of the interest is in researching the mentality and motivation and modii operandi of those rmilpeople who are still with us and still harassing informational posters, If you want to be thorough in your research, then you'll need to include studying those "informational posters" who still harass some "rmilpeople" simply because they were "rmilpeople". Also note: Many of these "informational posters" don't have information, as evidenced by their inability to provide any, even when it is requested of them.

To: Janice Shell who wrote (173)	11/29/1998 6:02:00 PM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 308

#reply-6155034 To: Cavalry (1319 ) From: Janice Shell Sunday, Oct 25 1998 12:56PM ET Reply # of 1501 putting two pieces of information in a continuous thought is not in bashers maual i guess. No. Unwarranted and utterly unfounded speculation is one of the things we tend to object to strongly. You're NOT LISTENING, CAV: if Bill Gates owned that much RACG he would HAVE TO DECLARE THE FACT. What is it you don't understand here? -------------------- #reply-6155074 To: Janice Shell (1312 ) From: Ellen Sunday, Oct 25 1998 1:05PM ET Reply # of 1501 You responded to: genius dont you realize dominion is the only possible fund, evans manages no others besides the two dominion funds and the maritime fund and gates has his personal money in one of the two dominion funds, funniest thing is you think dominion is open to the public, find anyone who will sell you shares? Your response: Your "analysis" is faulty. Very. Can you state why? Based on what source? Is Dominion open to the public or not? -------------------- #reply-6155219 To: Janice Shell (1327 ) From: Ellen Sunday, Oct 25 1998 1:25PM ET Reply # of 1502 I see. So you were just throwing out an opinion...not fact(s). What this has to do with Dominion and RACG is beyond me. You're kidding, right? Also, is Dominion open to the public or not? According to your "opinion", it is. But is it? -------------------- #reply-6155291 To: Janice Shell (1322 ) From: Ellen Sunday, Oct 25 1998 1:41PM ET Reply # of 1501 You're NOT LISTENING, CAV: if Bill Gates owned that much RACG he would HAVE TO DECLARE THE FACT. Whoa...trying real hard here to get beyond "style", as Forthright put it... But anyway, supposedly Gates would be (or is) invested in the Dominion fund. It is the fund that is invested in RACG. So, there would be no reporting (by Gates) required. Correct or not? -------------------- #reply-6155392 To: Ellen (1330 ) From: Janice Shell Sunday, Oct 25 1998 2:06PM ET Reply # of 1501 If he owned a greater-than-five percent interest in the fund, that fact would have to be reported. -------------------- #reply-6155862 To: Janice Shell (1334 ) From: Ellen Sunday, Oct 25 1998 3:18PM ET Reply # of 1503 If he owned a greater-than-five percent interest in the fund, that fact would have to be reported. Are you saying that if more than 5% of the fund's total monies is his, that he has to report that? If that is what you're saying...whoa... I don't believe that is so. -------------------- #reply-6155886 To: Janice Shell (1336 ) From: Ellen Sunday, Oct 25 1998 3:21PM ET Reply # of 1503 I'm sorry, but we weren't discussing Cav. We were discussing your "facts". >> This really won't do. << Again, I'm sorry, but simply saying "this really won't do" does not provide support for opinion. -------------------- #reply-6155907 To: Janice Shell (1340 ) From: Ellen Sunday, Oct 25 1998 3:24PM ET Reply # of 1503 Oh, by the way, you still haven't answered: Is the Dominion fund open to the public? Your opinion was that it is. But is it?