Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brady B. who wrote (16367)	11/29/1998 4:45:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 18444

>>>I wrote about exactly what was said in those 2 articles you idiot. For you to try and say I meant anything other than that reflects your own stupidity.<<< Brady, one more time. Fraud is prosecuted in a criminal court. Wage disputes are handled in a civil court. Your allegation that Zulu committed fraud (even with the civil employee contract issue still undecided by that court) is wrongful. You have convicted the unconvicted. And even if convicted, the venue is a civil case concerning an employee/employer dispute and is not what you call "fraud." Were fraud Colvins intention, then he'd have petitioned to the proper venue in order to have such charges criminally prosecuted against Zulu. This has not happened. But, according to your position, you are assuming it did. You're wrong, Brady. You're wrong.