Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (16377)	11/29/1998 5:42:00 PM
From: aleta	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

If you guys and gals PT mentioned read this please email me with some explanation or proof of what you've been doing all this time because for the life of me I can't figure out what it is! Aren't you proud of what you're doing? Don't you want the world to know? It sure might get new clients if they knew too. You might even be able to get a raise! halindsay@att.net

To: PartyTime who wrote (16377)	11/29/1998 6:08:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 18444

Brady, I hope you read this very, very carefully. It's about your language: >>>"The ex-simmers are probably what got the stock kicked off nasdaq. By filing the lawsuit they put zulu in a position that it could not be used to show assets. A (allegated) fraud riddled company has no place on a listed exchange. Until it is disproven they should not be allowed to even touch the nasdaq board."<<< Let's examine the language: a) "ex-simmers," implying the group of 'em; and b) "they," again implying the group of 'em. Questions: Is "ex-simmers" plural or singluar? Is "they" plural or singular? Is the only lawsuit against Zulu-tek from a "they" or a "he?" Did Colvin also sue his "ex-simmer" colleagues in the SAME lawsuit which HE is alleging against Zulu-tek? Is Colvin's suit, in actuality, an employee/employer contract termination dispute? And of course, Brady wrote: "By filing the lawsuit THEY [emphasis added] put zulu in a position ...." CONCLUSION: Brady clearly implied, through his wording above, that the lawsuit "THEY," "EX-SIMMERS," filed against Softbank was actually a lawsuit "THEY," "EX-SIMMERS" filed against Zulu-tek? Rather than picking favorites for your team, and leaving the 'little guy' out, why not make a fair linguistic judgment here? There's gotta be someone out there who can realistically see what I saw in this. Or does your kind of manure not make the grass grow green? (LOL)