Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon Tara who wrote (16388)	11/29/1998 6:33:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 18444

>>>In other words, PT, you were just plain wrong. Were you mistaken, or did you just make it up because it supported your argument?<<< I assume you're speaking about fraud being tried in a civil court where damages result, not imprisonment. My error was to assume that fraud would be prosecuted because it is a crime. Yes, I'm perfectly willing to admit where I am in error. Is Brady? Are you? Are you wrong to take his side on the secondary issue, but not be forthright in addressing the primary issue? Moreover, do you consider an employee termination bonus a serious issue of fraud? Or is "fraud" used as inflated legal language here in order to maximum a return on damages? And why did Colvin sue his fellow "ex-simmers" in this same case? He, Colvin, sued Zulu-tek; not "they," the "ex-simmers," as Brady implied. I dare say what we have here is a fraudulent intention to not understand the facts as they have happened on the thraads today. Why are you participating in that?