Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: aleta who wrote (16393)	11/29/1998 6:41:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 18444

>>>Yes, if he had it in writing and it was something he'd earned, then to deny him his money (bonus) is fraudulent.<<< OK, if this is the case, then how can Brady write the following? "The ex-simmers are probably what got the stock kicked off nasdaq. By filing the lawsuit they put zulu in a position that it could not be used to show assets." First off, the ex-simmers were sued by Colvin, as well, in this employee termination dispute with Zulu-tek. Secondly, Brady is implying that the "ex-simmers" sued Zulu-tek. They did not! Note how he used the plural rather than the singular. And, fundamentally, would the "ex-simmers" sue themselves?