Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon Tara who wrote (16405)	11/29/1998 10:36:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18444

Please SI Post 16405 before reading this one. Alternatively, Jon, there's another theory. And I've mentioned this scenario before. The last time I mentioned it, it infuriated Aleta. It goes as follows: A good way to destroy a stock--we'll use Zulu as the example--is to have: a) an anti-Zulu poster; b) a moderate-Zulu poster; and c) a pro-Zulu poster. The anti is always anti so the base of negativity always comes from this position. The moderate sometimes will lean to a positive position, but principally leaving negative impressions along the way. And the pro-Zulu position, at the critical moment, suddenly switches and assumes the anti-position. Where does the above scenario leave the innocent-thinking investor whose trying to get a read on what's going on? An individual with great chess playing (thinking) skills would more likely attempt to kill a stock this way, than the way you are suggesting. You see, your way could backfire. The scenario I've described above couldn't. Because in the scenario I've suggested, the "stockkiller(s)" succeed in not only eliminating all sense of trust and faith of investors in each other, but causes forces which should be aligned with one another to become, at best, confused or, at worst, diametrically opposed to each other. You've planted the 'positive-Zulu-poster-as-the-negative-Zulu poster' idea into Aleta's head and Aleta planted the same notion into Brady's head. I've watched this evolve in each of you, and a reading of the history of this thread will reflect this. The real fact is, you're sorrowfully wrong to question my intentions in this manner, and for you to do so is not only a complete distortion of truth, but it is harming in nature.