Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : International Automated Systems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Posey who wrote (1454)	11/30/1998 3:54:00 PM
From: Russ	Respond to of 7618

Hi Gang. RUSS here. Just thought I would let you know-----DAME it is good to see this thread come alive again. About DAM TIME. Why do you wait till you get some one like me to get on here to get it restarted. If this thing works have you ever considered how important this is to all of the world.???? Can't help but notice the stock is up at least a buck so I guess at least that is something. Another 13 or 14 and I am gone. See you when this company hits the big ticker but intll that happens if ever, I will still be watching. I don't care if I have to pay 50. for it, I still expect to see a workable product before I do. No more trying to punch holes in rain bows, show me that pot of gold. Show me that product. Please don't try to build a fire under each other. If you want to turn up the heat, put it where it belongs. The would has waited long enough. Just wanted to take the time to thank each and everyone for your time and your comments. Keep up the good work gang. Maybe we will all thrive or survive when the rubber hits the road. PEACE is much better then war. By for now RUSS

To: Jim Posey who wrote (1454)	11/30/1998 11:58:00 PM
From: paulmcg0	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7618

[Was there something I missed that said that you were the only one qualified to make such a review?] No, but then again, there has been -no- public review. For example, there has been nothing in respected, peer-reviewed journals like the "IEEE Transactions on Information Theory", the most well known journal in the field. (They would be especially interested since IAS has claimed that they can violate both the Shannon-Hartley limit and the Nyquist sampling criteria.) So, here's my challenge - give me the citations for any peer-reviewed, independent analysis of DWM in the technical literature. There are a number of large engineering schools around here, with extensive libraries, so I wouldn't have any problem finding the research papers. (And yes, I've periodically checked places like the COMPENDEX database, but oddly enough, there is no mention of IAS or DWM.) [Even if they did, you have previously stated that Professor Lusignan is part of a hoax] That's not what I said in the past - if I recall, I pointed out that someone's objectivity might be compromised because of a paid grant to study something. But then again, where are Lusignan's results anyway? Why aren't they public?

To: Jim Posey who wrote (1454)	12/1/1998 6:09:00 PM
From: Russ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7618

Hi Jim. Just thought I would take a sec. of your time. I just had a thought (which is rare on my side of the fence.) Could you maybe tell me why there is only 5 men following this. Would you mind if I took this time to invite everyone else to the party. Also idea #2 I think it would be a great idea if a rep. of IAUS would get on CNBC and talk to Mark Haines and Joe Kernan about our product. That would clear up a lot of questions. What do you think. I know I said I was going to go away but I just couldn't resist. Thanks for your time. Russ.