Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (6729)	11/30/1998 9:46:00 AM
From: Paunch	Respond to of 11603

Chuca, I am waiting for the first DD to prove what they have and i believe the shot will be heard around the world as soon as that happens. Have you heard anything on the announcement from GPGI this morning?

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (6729)	11/30/1998 5:17:00 PM
From: Tim Hall	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 11603

Chuca How much desert dirt could a dirt Chuca chuc if a dirt chuca could chuc dirt? No new new news from Maxam so here is some new old news. Tim "MAXAM Gold Corporation and Peoria Seven Mining LLC have appealed from a June 25, 1998, decision issued by the Phoenix (Arizona) Field Office, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), rejecting a portion of the Applellants'plan of operation calling for occupancy of the peoria Seven minsite for vat of heap leach operations. By letter dated August 25, 1998, Appelants notified BLM that they wished to "withdraw the Notice of Appeal." No copy of the August 25, 1998, letter was sent to this board. On September 14, 1998, BLM filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. A copy of the motion was served on Appelants, and the proof of Service filed by BLM indicates that Appelants received it on September 11, 1998. Sufficient time has passed for response to the BLM motion to dismiss, and Appelants have filed nothing in opposition to that motion. (1) There being no apparent reason for not doing so, the motion is hereby granted. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to the Board of Land Appeals by the Secretary of Interior, 43 C.F.R. para 4.1, the appeal docketed as IBLA 98-439 is hereby dismissed. (1) We also note that Appelants have failed to file a Statement of Reasons for Appeal, as required by 43 C.F.R. para 4.412(a), and their appeal is subject to summary dismissal at the discretion of this board. See 43 C.F.R. para : Robert L. True 101 IBLA 320 (1988) Certified letter sent to MAXAM on Oct 28, 1998