Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David R. Schaller who wrote (10883)	11/30/1998 12:46:00 PM
From: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck	Respond to of 14627

Thanks but I'm just a random walker like everyone else.

To: David R. Schaller who wrote (10883)	11/30/1998 2:21:00 PM
From: Nexus	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 14627

David, Yes, going in the right direction but unfortunatly uneconomical. Barrick looks like it's going to sit on it for the rest of the contract (June 2000 I think) without doing much else which leads me to beleive that there is not much hope for this property unless there is a huge rally in the price of gold and silver. Can't say I blame Barrick for staying though, you never know, we would do the same thing. Now, what's going on with La Colorada and let's get moving on the other promissing properties before the massive burn rate drives us out of business. Good luck to all, Nexus...