Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (16279)	11/30/1998 1:34:00 PM
From: pezz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<perjury about sex is "jaywalking">> My reference to jay walking was meant to imply that it was not a serious enough crime to warrant impeachment. <<I don't see any exceptions about sex in the perjury statute >> Do you think perjury about sex is as serious as perjury about murder? I believe you are a lawyer JLA tell me do the courts treat these two cases the same? Never said it wasn't a crime.Or that it shouldn't be treated as such. << Our system of laws...not open to individual interpretation>> I believe you left out something very critical in this quote JLA.My reference in this post to JP was in regard to taking the law into ones own hands because one believes one is right. That is,interpretation of justice so as to be morally justified in breaking the law. Clinton broke the law. I just say it was a minor crime and should be treated as such.You don't impeach for minor crimes IMO. You do give capitol punishment for ambush murder. I don't see any contradiction here. pez