Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : NET NANNY SOFTWARE NNS-V -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gator who wrote (1488)	11/30/1998 8:22:00 PM
From: Enigma	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1681

Gator - can you explain this reference: "Nasdaq requires $4.00 per share U.S" Surely the company checked this out before re-listing? E.

To: Gator who wrote (1488)	12/1/1998 9:02:00 AM
From: Enigma	Respond to of 1681

Gator - re the options - I think you can look at this as a glass half full or half empty. An option granted at $1.02 is quite reasonable IMO (and in the half full mode). I don't know how things are now, but when I was involved with companies listed on the TSE we could grant options at a 10% discount to the market price - so the price of $1.02 is in line with this criteria. I never like it when they re-price options down - although there are circumstances where this is understandable - where employees are not paid, or where the pay includes an option package - but in general I think re-pricing should be avoided. E