Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Who, me? who wrote (16381)	11/30/1998 9:47:00 PM
From: jimpit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Thanks, Who,me? ... I listen to Rush whenever I can, which is not that often, unfortunately. I read Drudge at least twice a day. I also peruse the Wash. Times, Wash. Post, NY Times, Free Republic, etc. Drudge usually scoops them all! Take care.

To: Who, me? who wrote (16381)	11/30/1998 11:19:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Who, you're all over the place here, and about as accurate as Drudge too. If Slate doesn't report it, it didn't happen! Slate is Bill Gates' e-rag, paid subscription now, I certainly don't read it. I had my first exposure to the Clinton hate industry there, though, in its forums. Who killed Vince Foster, anyway? It's also interesting how Schuh likes to discount Rush Limbaugh as a nobody. But Who, you said he was an entertainer. I never said he was a nobody. He's a one-sided cheap shot artist, and way too many people have adopted his style of "humor", in the form of derision of any politics other than the "right" politics. Very entertaining, if you're into ethnic jokes and that kind of stuff, or the particular kind of "substantive debate" ever popular here. My favorite Rush memory was when he went on Letterman, he had this deer in the headlights look. When he can't bring his Limbot audience along, he's not so funny. You're welcome to ignore me, but election wise, it seems that plenty enough people have chosen to ignore Drudge and Rush, and the other local favorite "objective" news source, the Washington Times. The rest of the press is so hopelessly biased compared to those "truthful" organs, right?