SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (16534)12/1/1998 5:51:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
You obviously know nothing about the criminal justice system. JLA



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (16534)12/1/1998 5:56:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit  Respond to of 67261
 
So he couldn't come up with anything to pin on Clinton with Whitewater, filegate, travelgate, who killed Vince Foster, and whatever else...

I beg to differ. Starr has completed just 5 years in this investigation. He still has another 40 years to finish his job (or less, if life on earth is finished off by an asteriod that scientists say is expected to collide with planet earth in the late 2020's...)



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (16534)12/1/1998 6:02:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Only a veeeery stupid person wouldn't know that prosecutors are paid to prosecute. A federal wire is a federal wire. If one commits a crime, as Lewinsky did that day, one should be subject to the full fury of the LAW.

But to real dummies like you, laws don't matter when it is not a republican breaking them.



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (16534)12/1/1998 6:40:00 PM
From: Ish  Respond to of 67261
 
<<Yes, JLA. Starr was entirely justified in "playing a little rough" to set up Clinton. That was his job, right? Get Clinton, no matter what. >>

That was the job he was hired to do by Janet Reno who was hired by Slick.