To: Paganini who wrote (6047 ) 12/1/1998 10:18:00 PM From: TOPFUEL Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 40688
LOL I have no interest in PNLK never have and if I get anymore threatening PMS I will report them to SI this is bull crap somebody asked me to do them a favor and I did heres the whole freakin email. I have no motive here at all. The only stock I ever bash is XCLU thats because me and my friends know its going nowhere so we have fun on the thread other than that I feel I only post when I have DD or can contribute to the thread. Happy Holidays David Original Message----- From: ztect <ztect@erols.com> To: tact13@aol.com <tact13@aol.com> Cc: maytran@ricochet.net <maytran@ricochet.net> Date: Tuesday, December 01, 1998 7:48 AM Subject: Please post for me (I'm off for posting too much until Thursday...so please post for me even if you don't like what I have to say) Question: How many over enthusiastic supporters of PNL are actually members of the site? If you were, you'd realize that excessive enthusiasm at this time may inadvertently re-affirm PNL as a Pump and Dump stock in the larger investment community. Why? If you were members on the site, you'd note the following: -Very few messages have been added to discussion boards since June. -My message in August on the "ask the expert" board asking who the experts were was never answered. -Company press releases have been updated since 8/26/98 -There have never been more than 1 or 2 classifieds listed at any one time in either the sell or buy sections. -The many "coming soon" forms haven't came since re-launch 9/1/98 (e.g.. Certificate of Health, Certificate Origin - GSP Form A ) -Some forms are blurry (e.g.. Certificate of Origin Spanish/English) -Forms that I thought were specifically written for PNL have earlier copywrite dates (e.g. 1990 Certificate of Origin - English) -Only members of PNL have email and web addresses available from database. -Database doesn't yet tell you enough about potential trading partners to provide you with anything other than a vague list of potential partners. ===================================== Using an analogy to retailing, Glenn right now , in essence, is establishing a network of distributors who'll provide customers i.e members to PNL's site. However, Glenn still has to deliver a better product to his distributors to sell. So not until I see **version 3** can I see support for higher prices of PNL's share price. Any run up is a pump and dump that will hurt PNL's credibility in the near term (and maybe for the long term as well). Why...not until Version 3? No product...no members / sales....no earning.... No justification of larger capitalization No support for higher valuation of share price. With version 3 and other items (i.e.. significant events) in outline on SI (see my post: siliconinvestor.com potential will warrant higher valuations. Do I "believe" in PNL's promise and vision? Is a horse a horse ...of course of course. Do I "believe" in the strength of the associations that PNL has formed? Yes...hallelujah Do I feel that PNL is worth even 3 or 3.50 a share? Simply no...or at least not yet. Believing and faith are not the basis for sound investment making decisions...or even speculating. PNL still has to work very hard and very diligently to incrementally implement its business plan. As of today, PNL is taking its first few steps but isn't yet walking...thus the share price shouldn't run after PNL just stopped crawling. Too much upside hyping and pumping is only for those wishing to trade out of PNL because not until SEC filings and version 3 release can there be any true basis for being so outwardly optimistic. Consequently, I'd conclude to sell at anything over 3....and to repurchase share when they slumped back down to $1.50. Sorry to be such a slap in the face ...But recent movement is only for traders. ztect