Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Malko who wrote (6120)	12/2/1998 10:02:00 AM
From: Warren A. Wilbur, Jr.	Respond to of 40688

Malko, I tend to disagree. I don't think Z is a great sophisticated investor. I think z is a great writer who pretends to invest in PNLK. I think Z is a short tarm trader and that's exactly what he suggests people should do. If investors will follow this advice and the stock will trade 1 to 3. This will do more long term to this stock then any basher can. Z did a hell of a job in getting folks to trust him and than pull the EXACT same BS he pulled last time !!! I urge people to go and read on the 'old' thread and see how history with Z repeats itself. I don't know if it's his personality or self serving interest. He is NOT Mr. Honesty who would like everything to be OK with the Co. What the Co. and the investors could use now is a new HIGHER base ,if it suits Z or not. I hope Z gave his OK to EBay to trade @ 200 <G> What happen to all of us who were at the Ver. II site and were all excited about it ??? I for one think it works a lot better than other sites I have seen ! Regards and check your PM (Sp. not checked <G>)

To: Malko who wrote (6120)	12/2/1998 4:26:00 PM
From: Fred Davis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 40688

Hello to all. It's hard to believe that one man's opinion could stir up so much controversy. Nothing at all has changed. We all have known after V2 that the sight was not perfect and will take several revisions, IMO. I have ask on occasion if anyone here was using the site for day to day business. I, as probably many of you, signed up for the trial membership to get a feel for our investment. IMO I was unable to make a fair judgement of the site since no customer base exist for my line of work, however due to the recent alliances with e-commerce businesses, to which I am sure, know far more than I as to the potential of PNL, should have helped to build confidence that in time PNL will be a leader in their field. This valuation issue is total bs for any internet stock. How can EBAY be worth it's present price? They may well be further along in growing their business but we still can't value the company based on the balance sheets. I will continue to pick up shares at present levels as funds become available and still believe in this visionary concept. As to what price is PNLK worth, I have no idea and IMO pick a number, any number. Speaking of numbers, as I have said in the past, when PNL becomes a reporting company and lays the cards on the table, all this market manipulation won't stop the train. Call it hype, confidence, blind faith, etc., etc., Regards, Fred