Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (16641)	12/2/1998 10:16:00 AM
From: Short A. Few	Respond to of 67261

Yes, I agree. Packwood perhaps being more selective and perhaps more persistent and obnoxious is not a material difference, in my mind. Being molested by the president has to be a little more shocking! regards, Short

To: Bill who wrote (16641)	12/2/1998 1:44:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Bill we have told you a million times that we think Paula happily participated in all kinds of amoral activities in that hotel room and filed this suit because Clinton never called her again. That is what people mean when they say they "dont believe" Paula. Everybody believes she went there the question is what happened, why and what are her motivations now. Thanks for pointing out my anti-Packwood crowd allegiance, I forgot my pin today that has packwoods face with an X through the middle of it (which I normally wear on my lapel)