Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WavePhore (WAVO)- VBI fed WaveTop for WebTV -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lynn who wrote (2143)	12/2/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: AJ Berger	Respond to of 2843

Looks like More Dumping into the Close $9-1/8 to $9-1/4 bid/ask DayTrader's closing their positions late. Whole market's back in the drink as well. that Boeing/Sears news spooked many today. tomorrows another day... --------------------------------------------- stolen from Yahoo: Cramer did materialistically bash the company by: paisleypajamas 10744 of 10753 1) Cramer repeatedly used the terms "FRAUD-U-NET" and WavePhore in the same sentence... seeming to indicate that there was something fraudulant going on. It's not WavePhore's fault that there is an internet frenzy going on, they are just caught in the middle of it all. 2) Immediately after mentioning he could not place his order(to short 25,000 shares), he concluded that he was going to "ream" the CEO about the company. In fact this dialog ended with Joe Kernan warning Cramer to calm down because the CEO didn't appear yet and Joe was worried about him cancelling. 3) The whole reason for a second interview was because the CEO was not given a chance to represent the company's technology the first time through. This was again the case. The interview turned into a spanish inquisition, trying to prove that the company wasn't worth the stock price... instead of being an interview about the company and it's technology. Don't try to take the steam out of what Cramer did... he was at his worst... and I glad to see that he finally stepped over the edge. At least people can see what he's really all about now. He deserves whatever he has coming. Posted: Dec 2 1998 3:47PM EST as a reply to: Msg 10737 by YaoMail

To: Lynn who wrote (2143)	12/2/1998 4:00:00 PM
From: Gary Armstrong	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2843

I totally agree lynn, but I assume the tone...whatever form it takes will be positive vs negative...don't you?

To: Lynn who wrote (2143)	12/2/1998 8:33:00 PM
From: David Peterson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2843

Lynn, the damage is done! Just like the lawyer that retracts his statement after the jury has heard his comments. Both CNBC and Cramer should be held accountable regardless of their retraction statement. Joe Kernan is another whose comments go to far ...he bad mouths a lot of good companies when they are working through problems. Guess what happens? The comments were slanderous and uncalled for. CNBC needs to clean up its act....look what happened to Dorfman. D. Peterson