To: Ahda who wrote (23750 ) 12/3/1998 6:01:00 PM From: goldsnow Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116759
Full story American science, math teachers flunk test - study 05:38 p.m Dec 03, 1998 Eastern By Michael Kahn WASHINGTON, Dec 3 (Reuters) - American students lag behind much of the world in math and science because their classes are boring, unfocused and incoherent, researchers said on Thursday. Educators, parents and politicians were shocked earlier this year when an international study showed American children score worse than the rest of the world in the two subjects. The Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) ranked U.S. 12th-graders, aged 17 and 18, 18th out of 21 countries -- far behind Sweden and the Netherlands and ahead only of Lithuania, Cyprus and South Africa. But William Schmidt, an applied statistician at Michigan State University, and colleagues say pupils are not to blame. ''The U.S. curriculum appears not only to have been unfocused but highly repetitive, lacking coherence, and providing little rigorous challenge during the middle years, particularly when compared to those of other TIMSS countries,'' they wrote in the journal Science. The TIMSS study measured general math and science literacy in third, fourth, seventh, and eighth graders and at high school seniors in the U.S. and more than 40 other countries. Schmidt took a closer look at the results, released earlier this year. ''This tries to put it all together and paint a larger picture,'' said Schmidt, who is also the U.S. national research coordinator for the TIMSS study. One of the key findings after an analysis of more than 1,500 textbook and curricula frameworks from about 50 countries was that Americans tried to teach too much, Schmidt said in a telephone interview. For example, U.S. math textbooks for 8th graders cover about 35 topics compared to an average of seven in Germany and Japan, he said. U.S. curricula also covered more topics than in those of virtually all other TIMSS countries. This can be a problem because it gives teachers little time to spend on each topic and textbooks often repeat familiar ones, Schmidt explained. This fails to challenge students and causes them to lose interest. ''This is the mile-wide, inch-deep curriculum we are talking about,'' he said. Schmidt said American students are studying simpler subjects, like fractions and earth sciences, at the same age as children elsewhere are beginning algebra, chemistry and physics, he said. ''Our students are not now being taught on par with students from other countries,'' he said, calling for a national programme. States now set their own curricula. Glen Cutlip, a spokesman for the National Education Association, which represents most teachers, agreed there are problems with U.S. curriculum and said his group was concerned about the performance of American students. But it would be expensive to change because it would require new textbooks and expanded teacher training. ''If students can learn more than we are teaching then we would see that as a problem,'' Cutlip said. ''But we have to decide how important it is to us as a society, if we are willing to devote the resources it would take to make those changes.'' W. Virginia Williams, spokeswoman for the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, agreed there are ingrained problems with the U.S. curriculum and said studies like this can help draw public attention to the issue. ''The things that Schmidt has pointed out are not at all anything our council has disagreed with,'' Williams said in a telephone interview. ''If we continue to ask our students lower-level questions, they won't rise beyond that.'' Copyright 1998 Reuters Limited