SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : HDCO - Why sudden dip? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kolo55 who wrote (532)12/3/1998 1:39:00 PM
From: rich evans  Respond to of 572
 
Also interesting to compare HDCO cc with PGTZ results/call last Oct 20th. PGTZs gross margins last quarter were 17% up from 15% but I think they do more Q/T design then HDCO on a percentage of gross revs. Of course HDCO has the VAM contribution. PGTZs problem seems to be the SGA which was 12.7%. But their B/B had risen to 1.2 and their Malaysia facility seemed to be doing better than HDCOs. PGTZs gross margins were a lot higher than HDCOs despite running at the same capicity utilization of about 80% for US facilities and their problems getting Huntsville going. Huntsville and Malaysia cost PGTZ 8 cents a share of which 5 cents was Malaysia. So maybe HDCO can do better than 15% gross margin. PGTZs margin improvement was 80% cap utilization leverage and 20% materials according to them .Back in Sept I thought about switching horses and putting the HDCO shares into more JBIL and FLEX and now I am kicking myself. But I thought that HDCO had more earning power when things rebounded. I'm thinking now that HDCOs earning power is more in the $2-3/share and not the $3-4 based on their present capacity limits of 1.2 bill which they are not increasing according to cc. HDCOs is constrained by their high debt and I don,t know if they can keep pace with the Taiwanese or Hicks Muse who have lots more money. But the sun is shining here at last so I think I'll walk the dog and think about other things.

Rich



To: kolo55 who wrote (532)1/13/1999 1:31:00 PM
From: rich evans  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 572
 
Hdco downgraded by K. Dunne today at Robby Stevens reducing 99 and 2000 estimates considerably. I think it is margin related for one thing. But with DIIG buying IBMs volume PCB business in Austin with IBM committing to buy its needs there for 3 years and SLR buying IBM assembly in Austin, I am guessing that the SLR Austin PCB business will be going to DIIG as part of the SLR deal and not HDCO. I thought I was clear on my $40 put Friday but now I will own some more. Should have closed when HDCO hit 41. Oh well maybe a blessing in disguise who knows. Do you still own your position and have any thoughts on HDCO looking forward?
Rich